К 20-летию ВТО: критический взгляд на практику Органа по разрешению споров
Аннотация
Рассмотрена деятельность Органа по разрешению споров ВТО с критической точки зрения, представляющего собой, по мнению автора, своеобразный институт, сочетающий дипломатические и судебные компоненты. Именно с этих позиций проанализированы такие ее особенности, как специфический характер выносимых решений, основанный на ответных мерах механизм выполнения решений, эволюция роли и видов мировых соглашений, заключаемых в рамках ВТО.
Скачивания
Литература
WTO disputes reach 400 mark // WTO Press release. PRESS/578. 2009. 6 nov.
Шумилов В.М. Право Всемирной торговой организации (ВТО). М.: Юрайт, 2013.
Смбатян А.С. Всемирная торговая организация: уникальность и адекватность // Право ВТО. 2012. № 1.
Alschner W. Amicable settlements of WTO disputes: bilateral solutions in a multilateral system // World Trade Review. 2014. Vol. 13. № 1.
URL: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_current_status_e.htm
Leitner K., Lester S. WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–2013 — а statistical analysis // Journal of International Economic Law. 2014. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 191–201.
Steger D. Establishment of a Dispute Tribunal in the WTO // Trade and development symposium. Perspectives on the Multilateral Trading System. A Collection of Short Essays. URL: http://www.ictsd.org/downloads/2012/02/ debra-stegerestablishment-of-a-dispute-tribunal-in-the-wto.pdf
United States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint). WT/DS353/AB/R, adopted 23 march 2012.
European Communities — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, WT/DS316/R, adopted 1 june 2011.
WTO dispute settlement statistics, 1 january 1995 — 23 september 2011.
Davey W.J. Expediting the Panel Process in WTO Dispute Settlement / M.E. Janow, V. Donaldson, A. Janovich (eds.) // The WTO governance, dispute settlement and developing countries (Juris 2008). P. 409–470.
Busch M., Pelc K. Does the WTO need a permanent body of panelists? // Journal of International Economic Law. 2009. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 579–594.
Petersmann E. Ten years of the WTO dispute settlement system: past, present and future // Journal of international law and policy. 2004. Vol. III. P. 1–48.
Australia – Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon (“Australia – Salmon”). WT/DS18/AB/R, adopted 6 november 1998.
Kelly T. The WTO environment and health and safety standards // The World Economy. 2003. Vol. 26. Is. 2. P. 131–151.
EC — Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) (European Communities – Hormones). WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, adopted 13 february 1998. Para. 89.
India – Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products, WT/DS50/AB/R, adopted 16 january 1998. Para. 46.
Cottier Th. The WTO Permanent Panel Body – A Bridge Too Far? // Journal of International Economic Law. 2003. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 187–202.
Bourgeois H.J. Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body // Journal of International Economic Law. 2003. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 211–214.
Shoyer A.W. Panel Selection in WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures // Journal of International Economic Law. 2003. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 203–209.
Weiler J.H. The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement // Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper. 2000. No. 9.
Bello J. The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More // American Journal of International Law. 1996. Vol. 90. P. 416–417.
Charnovitz S. The Enforcement of WTO Judgment // The Yale Journal of international Law. 1999. Vol. 34. P. 558–566.
Jackson J.H. International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”? // American Journal of international Law. 2004. Vol. 98. P. 109–125.
WTO Current status of disputes. URL: http://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_current_status_e.htm
United States — Section 110(5) of US Copyright Act. WT/DS160/R, adopted 15 june 2000.
United States — Subsidies on Upland Cotton. WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted 21 march 2005.
Memorandum of understanding between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Federative Republic of Brazil reading a fund for technical assistance and capacity building with respect to the Cotton dispute (WT/DS267) in the WTO. URL: http://www.brazilcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ MOUonaFundforTAandCB-Apr202010.pdf
Revised Memorandum of understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union, 21 october 2013. URL: http://eur-ex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2014:027:000 2:0006:EN:PDF.
Grimmett J. WTO Dispute Settlement: Status of U.S. Compliance in Pending Cases Congressional Research Service. 2012. 23 apr.
Horlick G., Coleman J. The compliance problem of the WTO // Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law. 2007. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 142.
President’s Statement on Steel Proclamation. 2003. 4 dec. URL: http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/ releases/2003/12/20031204-5.html
