Формирование межрегиональных торговых соглашений: какие факторы побуждают торговые блоки к сотрудничеству?
Аннотация
Данное исследование предоставляет объяснение формированию межрегиональных торговых соглашений через «теорию переговоров»
посредством акцентирования внимания на роли доходов от торговли, глубины интеграции в рамках блока, уровня развития блока, членства
и истории споров в ВТО. Результаты демонстрируют позитивное и значительное влияние доходов от торговли, глубины интеграции и членства в ВТО, тогда как история споров значительно, но негативно влияет на межрегиональное сотрудничество. Данные результаты имеют важное значение для лиц, ответственных за формирование и реализацию политики в сфере внешнеторговой деятельности, при заключении торговых соглашений между блоками.
Скачивания
Литература
Andean Community. European Commission [Electronic Resource]. URL: <http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/regions/andean-community> (accessed 25.10.2017).
Andean Countries-European Union. Organization of American States [Electronic Resource] URL: <http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/AND_EU/AND_EU_e.ASP> (accessed 25.10.2017).
V. K. Aggarwal, E. A. Fogarty. Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Transregional and Inter-Regional Trade Strategies. University of California, 2009.
V. K. Aggarwal, E. A. Fogarty. The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America. European Integration, 27, No. 3 (2005), pp. 327–346.
L. Baccini, Y. K. Soo. Preventing protectionism: International institutions and trade policy. The Review of International Organizations, 7, No. 4 (2012),
pp. 369–398.
C. S. Bajo. The European Union and Mercosur: A case of inter-regionalism.Third World Quarterly, 20, No. 5 (1999), pp. 927–941.
R. Baldwin, D. Jaimovich. Are free trade agreements contagious? Journal of International Economics, 88, No. 1 (2012), pp. 1–16.
B. Nathaniel, J. N. Katz, R. Tucker. Taking time seriously: Time-series-crosssection analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42, No. 4 (1998), pp. 1260–1288.
I. Boyer. Quantitative assessment of a free trade agreement between MERCOS- UR and the European Union. Vol. 69. United Nations Publications, 2010.
A. Estevadeordal, E. Krivonos. The trade and cooperation nexus: How does the MERCOSUR-EU process measure up? (Occasional Paper ITD= Docu-mento de Divulgación ITD; 22). Vol. 22. BID-INTAL, 2000.
D. Ettore, S. Firpo, M. Fratzscher, F. P. Mongelli. The link between institution-al and economic integration: Insights for Latin America from the European
experience. Open Economies Review, 15, No. 3 (2004), pp. 239–260.
B. Efird, M. G. Gaspare. Structural conditions and the propensity for region-al integration. European Union Politics, 3, No. 3 (2002), pp. 267–295.
B. Efird, J. Kugler, G. Gaspare. From war to integration: Generalizing power transition theory. International Interactions, 29, No. 4 (2003), pp. 293–313.
EU signs comprehensive trade agreement with Colombia and Peru. Euro-pean Commission [Electronic Resource]. URL: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=810 (accessed 22.12.2017).
J. Faust. The European Union’s Trade Policy towards MERCOSUR. Working Paper PEIF-7, 2002. [Electronic Resource] URL: <http://ies.berkeley.edu/pubs/workingpapers/PEIF-7-MERCOSUR.pdf> (accessed 17.09.2017).
J. D. Fearon. Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. Inter-national organization, 52, No. 02 (1998), pp. 269–305.
Y. Feng, G. Genna. Regional integration and domestic institutional homoge-neity: A comparative analysis of regional integration in the Americas, Pacific Asia and Western Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 10, No. 2 (2003), pp. 278–309.
Y. Feng, G. Genna. Measuring Regional Integration. Claremont Regional In-tegration Workshop with Particular Reference to Asia, Claremont, Vol. 25, 2005, pp. 25–33.
K. P. Gallagher. Understanding developing country resistance to the Doha round. Review of international political economy, 15, No. 1 (2007), pp. 62–85.
G. Alemayehu, H. Kebret. Regional economic integration in Africa: A review of problems and prospects with a case study of COMESA. Journal of African Economies, 17, No. 3 (2008), pp. 357–394.
G. Genna. Does North America have the right stuff? An analysis of compat-ibility and the potential deepening of North American integration. Politics & Policy, 39, No. 1 (2011), pp. 141–165.
G. Genna, H. Taeko. Power Preponderance and Domestic Politics: Explaining Regional Economic Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1960–1997. International Interactions, 30, No. 2 (2004), pp. 143–164.
E. B. Haas. International integration: The European and the universal process. International Organization, 15, No. 03 (1961), pp. 366–392.
Y. Z. Haftel. From the outside looking in: The effect of trading blocs on trade disputes in the GATT/WTO. International Studies Quarterly, 48, No. 1 (2004), pp. 121–142.
G. C. Hufbauer, J. J. Schott. Western hemisphere economic integration. Peterson Institute, 1994.
K. King, M. Tomz, J. Wittenberg. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American journal of political science (2000), pp. 347–361.
A. Malamud, P. Schmitter. The experience of European integration and the potential for integration in South America, 2007.
E. D. Mansfield. Regionalism in the Americas at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century: NAFTA and Mercosur, in Lukauskas A., Stern R., Zanini G. Hand-book of trade policy for development. Oxford University Press, 2013.
E. D. Mansfield, H. V. Milner. The new wave of regionalism. International organization, 53, No. 03 (1999), pp. 589–627.
E. D. Mansfield, H. V. Milner . Votes, vetoes, and the political economy of international trade agreements. Princeton University Press, 2012.
E. D. Mansfield, J. Pevehouse. Trade blocs, trade flows, and international conflict. International organization, 54, No. 04 (2000), pp. 775–808.
E. D. Mansfield, J. Pevehouse. The expansion of preferential trading arrangements. International Studies Quarterly, 57, No. 3 (2013), pp. 592–604.
E. D. Mansfield, E. Reinhardt. Multilateral determinants of regionalism: The effects of GATT/WTO on formation of preferential trading arrangements. International organization, 57, No. 04 (2003), pp. 829–862.
E. D. Mansfield, E. Reinhardt. International institutions and the volatility of international trade. International Organization, 62, No. 04 (2008), pp. 621–
M. G. Marshall, K. Jaggers. Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002, 2002.
W. Mattli. The logic of regional integration: Europe and beyond. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
T. Mayer, Z. Soledad. Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database, 2011.
H. V. Milner. Industries, governments, and regional trade blocs. The political economy of regionalism (1997), pp. 77–106.
J. A. Frankel, E. Stein, W. Shang-Jin. Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Peterson Institute, 1997.
Peru and Colombia Sign FTA with European Union. The Peruvian Times. [Electronic Resource] URL: <http://www.peruviantimes.com/27/peru-and-colombia-sign-fta-with-european-union/16120> (accessed 14.08.2017).
A. K. Rose. Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? No. 9273. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.
J. Rüland. ASEAN and the European Union: A bumpy interregional relationship. Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung, Bonn, 2001.
F. Söderbaum, P. Stålgren, L. V. Langenhove. The EU as a global actor and the dynamics of interregionalism: a comparative analysis. European Integration,
, No. 3 (2005), pp. 365–380.
I. Szegedy-Maszák. Association/free trade agreement-bi-regional partnership between European Union and Andean Community. Revista de Derecho, 32 (2009), pp. 218–245.
The EU’s relations with the Andean Community, the European Union External Action. [Electronic Resource] URL: <http://eeas.europa.eu/andean/index_en.htm> (accessed 23.12.2017).
The International Monetary Fund. Direction of Trade Statistics [Data file]. Retrieved from URL: <http://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85> (2015).
The World Bank. World Development Indicators. GDP per capita (current US$) [Data file]. Retrieved from URL: <http://data.worldbank.org/indica-tor/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD> (2016a).
The World Bank. World Development Indicators. GDP per capita (constant 2005 US$) [Data file]. Retrieved from URL: <http://data.worldbank.org/in-dicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD> (2016b).
The World Trade Organization. Members and observers. [Electronic Resource] URL: <https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm> (accessed 10.12.2017) (2015a).
The World Trade Organization. Disputes by country/territory. [Electronic Resource] URL: <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_by_country_e.htm> (accessed 05.11.2017) (2015b).
M. Tomz, J. Wittenberg, G. King. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software, 8, No. 1 (2003), pp. 1–30.
M. Tomz, J. L. Goldstein, D. Rivers. Do we really know that the WTO increas-es trade? Comment. The American Economic Review, 97, No. 5 (2007), pp. 2005–2018.
M. Telò. (ed.). European Union and new regionalism: regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2013.
W. Geest. An EU-ASEAN free trade agreement: Sharing benefits of globali-sation. European Institute for Asian Studies. 2004.
J. Whalley. Why do countries seek regional trade agreements? The Regional-ization of the World Economy. University of Chicago Press, 1998.
