Суд Евразийского экономического союза: особенности первых судебных процессов

  • Юрий Ровнов Консультант по международному торговому праву
  • Надежда Андреевна Спорышева
Ключевые слова: ЕАЭС, Суд ЕАЭС, Евразийский экономический союз

Аннотация

This article offers an overview of the first years of case law of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, which started its work on 1 January 2015. Both procedural and substantive issues are covered, ranging from the pre-litigation procedure and the presentation of new pleas in law during court proceedings to the mutual recognition of customs authorities’ decisions in the Union and the deferral of the decision to impose anti-dumping measures beyond the maximum duration of an anti-dumping investigation.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Литература

Oficial'nyj internet-portal pravovoj informacii. URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201501160013 [Accessed 2018].

Court of the Eurasian Economic Union. URL: http://courteurasian.org [Accessed 2018].

Neshataeva, T., Myslivskii, P. and Dʹi︠a︡chenko, E. (2015). Evraziiskai︠a︡ integrat︠s︡ii︠a︡: rol’ suda [Eurasian Integration: The Role of the Court] Moscow: Statut, pp.107-129.

Statute of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union. (2018). URL: http://courteurasian.org/en/ [Accessed 2018].

General Freight v. Commission, Decision of the Panel of 04 April 2016, p. 16.

General Freight v. Commission, Decision of the Appeals Chamber of 21 June 2016, pp. 15–16, 19.

Tarasik v. Commission, Decision of the Panel of 28 December 2015, p. 15.

Rules of Procedure of the Court. (2018). URL:http://courteurasian.org/en [Accessed 2018].

ArcelorMittal Kryvyi Rih v. Commission, Decision of the Panel of 27 April 2017, p. 26.

Gamma v. Commission, Order of the Panel of 10 March 2015, pp. 1–3.

Tarasik v. Commission, Decision of the Appeals Chamber of 3 March 2016, pp. 18–19.

Oil Marine Group v. Commission, Decision of the Panel of 11 October 2018, p. 10.

Rusta-Broker v. Commission, Order of the Panel of 12 December 2016, pp. 1–4.

Court of the Eurasian Economic Union. (2018). Dogovor ob obrashhenii v sud EvrAzJes. URL: http://courteurasian.org/page-21691 [Accessed 2018].

Ispolinov, A. (2016) Statut suda EAES kak otrazhenie opaseniy i somneniy gosugarstv-chlenov Evraziiskogo soyuza [The Statute of the Court as a Reflection of the Concerns and Doubts of the Member States of the Eurasian Union] 4 Pravo, The Journal of the Higher School of Economics, p.160.

Tsouz.ru. (2010). Agreement on Mutual Administrative Assistance Among Customs Authorities of the Member States of the Customs Union. URL: http://www.tsouz.ru/MGS/mgs21-05-10/Pages/Sogl_vzaimn_adm_pom.aspx [Accessed 2018].

Szrf.ru. (2009). Customs Code Treaty. URL: http://www.szrf.ru/doc.phtml?nb=edition00&issid=2010050000&docid=221 [Accessed 2018].

Russia v. Belarus, Order of the Grand Panel of 12 September 2016, p. 5.

Russia v. Belarus, Decision of the Grand Panel of 21 February 2017, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Fedortsov, p. 2.

Russia v. Belarus, Decision of the Grand Panel of 21 February 2017, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Kolos, p. 9.

Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2008 O.J. C 115/47, at 47.

Russia v. Belarus, Decision of the Grand Panel of 21 February 2017, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Neshataeva, pp. 12–13.

Article 84, Rules of Procedure of the General Court, OJ L 105, 23 April 2015, p. 1.

WTO Appellate Body Report, Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products (Korea – Dairy), WT/DS98/AB/R, adopted 12 January 2000, para 139.

World Customs Organization. URL: http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature/instrument-and-tools/hs-nomenclature-2017-edition/hs-nomenclature-2017-edition.aspx [Accessed 2018].

Sevlad v. Commission, Decision of the Panel of 7 April 2016, p. 20.

Szrf.ru. (2011). Agreement on the Eurasian Economic Commission of 18 November. URL:http://www.szrf.ru/doc.phtml?nb=edition00&issid=2012011000&docid=93 [Accessed 2018].

Remdiesel v. Commission, Order of the Panel of 8 April 2016, pp. 2–3.

Mddoc.mid.ru. (2017). Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union. URL: http://mddoc.mid.ru/api/ia/download/?uuid=b48c5fca-9b44-40d4-ad92-40a5987f8f82 [Accessed 2018].

Mddoc.mid.ru. (2011). Agreement on the Functioning of the Customs Union within the Framework of the Multilateral Trading System. URL: http://mddoc.mid.ru/api/ia/download/?uuid=42c5a7ed-02fd-44cc-beed-a463ec239867 [Accessed 2018].

GATT Secretariat. (2002). The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, the Legal Texts. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/19-adp_01_e.htm [Accessed 2018].

Consultant.ru. (2014). Agreement on the Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_169854/ [Accessed 2018].

Advisory Opinion of the Grand Panel of 4 April 2017, p. 5.

Mddoc.mid.ru. (2008). Agreement on the Application of Safeguard, Anti-Dumping, and Countervailing Measures in Respect of Third Countries. URL:

http://mddoc.mid.ru/api/ia/download/?uuid=ff901a03-4a0d-4505-88f4-bfa63570d2d4.

WTO Panel Report, Brazil – Measures Affecting Desiccated Coconut (Brazil – Desiccated Coconut), WT/DS22/R, adopted 20 March 1997, para 258.

Опубликован
2018-12-27
Как цитировать
РовновЮ., & СпорышеваН. А. (2018). Суд Евразийского экономического союза: особенности первых судебных процессов. Торговая политика, 4(16), 38-81. извлечено от https://tpjournal.hse.ru/article/view/8401
Раздел
Торговая политика, международные организации по вопросам торговли F13